It's particularly insulting because no one could be bothered to come up with a useful, interesting problem description that is not loaded to the hilt with acronyms of systems that are only ever relevant to their current system:
> If the TFM strategy involves a GDP, AFP, or CTOP, FMDS allocates arrival slots for the constrained
resource to NAS users and computes Expect Departure Clearance Times (EDCTs) for all included flights
that are still on the ground.
While we are here... where on earth is the reference/demo data? How do they expect anyone to make a visualization going purely from verbose specs?
> If the TFM strategy involves a GDP, AFP, or CTOP, FMDS allocates arrival slots for the constrained resource to NAS users and computes Expect Departure Clearance Times (EDCTs) for all included flights that are still on the ground.
While we are here... where on earth is the reference/demo data? How do they expect anyone to make a visualization going purely from verbose specs?