Unfortunately, I'd need a few more fingers. Not too many though which makes that argument for Cucumber fairly moot. I did work somewhere where each team had 2 testers. One to write the cucumber and one to write the glue code for it. It was about as successful as you could imagine.
I'd also say "non-coding" rather than "non-technical". Coding is just one aspect of being "technical".
There is benefit in making the tests easy to read but this is better done in actual code, e.g. the screenplay pattern.
I'd also say "non-coding" rather than "non-technical". Coding is just one aspect of being "technical".
There is benefit in making the tests easy to read but this is better done in actual code, e.g. the screenplay pattern.