> in order to have accuracy and a fully satisfactory experience, it requires some conditions, because it deals with random variables that I still don't have full control over
> I'm really afraid we can't solve a "mediocre diction" problem.
So you're not asking "How can I present my work-in-progress to potential customers so that they focus on the potential & not the missing features?".
Instead your asking "How can I present a product that has (and always will have) limitations?" and so will never have a "fully satisfactory experience". Is that right?
I think this is an important distinction (that I didn't get from reading your original post).
> I'm really afraid we can't solve a "mediocre diction" problem.
So you're not asking "How can I present my work-in-progress to potential customers so that they focus on the potential & not the missing features?".
Instead your asking "How can I present a product that has (and always will have) limitations?" and so will never have a "fully satisfactory experience". Is that right?
I think this is an important distinction (that I didn't get from reading your original post).