unison has a UI to manage conflicts on a file level, whereas synchthing only allows a manual overwrite of all changes at once, and i have to log into the remote daemon if i want to overwrite changes there instead of locally.
syncthing also will not tell me if all local changes arrived at the remote side, or if the remote is still busy downloading, without logging into the remote daemon
on the other hand, unison only manages one source/target per process if i remember correctly while syncthing can manage many different source/target pairs conveniently.
unison has a UI to manage conflicts on a file level, whereas synchthing only allows a manual overwrite of all changes at once, and i have to log into the remote daemon if i want to overwrite changes there instead of locally.
syncthing also will not tell me if all local changes arrived at the remote side, or if the remote is still busy downloading, without logging into the remote daemon
on the other hand, unison only manages one source/target per process if i remember correctly while syncthing can manage many different source/target pairs conveniently.
how does mutagen compare in these two areas?