When you read the posts and when you don't rely on titles, you can see the point that the author argues.
2FA does suck, it's not a pleasant experience but it is necessary. If something sucks, it does not mean that you don't have to or should not have to use it. There are things that hinder user experience but are immense for security, like 2FA is.
Making judgment based on title is silly, and if the spirit of HN is to judge without facts - then I apologize. Carry on as you were.
The strawman argument against the author, based on the title that provokes thought, is not a sign of intellectual discussion.
2FA does suck, it's not a pleasant experience but it is necessary. If something sucks, it does not mean that you don't have to or should not have to use it. There are things that hinder user experience but are immense for security, like 2FA is.
Making judgment based on title is silly, and if the spirit of HN is to judge without facts - then I apologize. Carry on as you were.
The strawman argument against the author, based on the title that provokes thought, is not a sign of intellectual discussion.