So, the solar panels conveyed with the house (as physical property), but the contracts covering them were never (re-)agreed to by you? And the lien wasn't against the physical solar panels?
I'd be curious how the state organization thought they had cause to pursue you?
How is that not the seller not lying about property (they didn't own the panels free and clear) and thus liable for effectively selling stolen property? In which case, state organization would be free to sue the seller, and you have no part in the proceedings.
I'd be curious how the state organization thought they had cause to pursue you?
How is that not the seller not lying about property (they didn't own the panels free and clear) and thus liable for effectively selling stolen property? In which case, state organization would be free to sue the seller, and you have no part in the proceedings.
What laws did it end up turning on?