What is the status of ubsan, msan, tsan and others support for GCC though?
Last time I checked they were a bit behind.
I agree GCC make clang obscolete regarding C++ support and even performance.
I don't know a comprehensive alternative to clang linter but I'm sure there are a few.
Given that llvm receive more human resources than gcc by far, I once expected it to outperform gcc generally (e.g support for polyhedral optimizations, BOLT, etc)
Unfortunately weirdly it seems llvm performance is mostly stagnant. I personally suspect we are reaching increasingly diminishing returns with AOT and that the performance graal would be a hybrid that also does JIT at runtime (beyond PGO therefore) and more interpretable than BOLT
Given that llvm receive more human resources than gcc by far, I once expected it to outperform gcc generally (e.g support for polyhedral optimizations, BOLT, etc) Unfortunately weirdly it seems llvm performance is mostly stagnant. I personally suspect we are reaching increasingly diminishing returns with AOT and that the performance graal would be a hybrid that also does JIT at runtime (beyond PGO therefore) and more interpretable than BOLT