Comment

Comment by curiousllama

Really love the idea, and the passion behind it. Def could have legs.

Here’s the pitfalls I see you falling into:

(1) seriously, what data are you collecting? “Everything” isn’t a great answer (who’s supposed to use ‘everything’, anyway? “Anyone”?). “Apples-to-apples police misconduct statistics” is a good one.

(2) it’s important to clarify 1 because you need to know who you’re serving, and why. Different activists need different data. “Have all data” sounds good until you need to decide how to allocate your resources.

(3) more deeply, data is the land of edge cases. Even just with police misconduct, you need to get DEEP to rigorously compare seemingly-simple stats like “# of unjustified police killings”. If you don’t start narrow, you’ll never show value. If you don’t show value, nobody will ever care you exist.

When I look at the data you’ve collected, it ranges from annual reports, to municipal contact info, to crime stats. What’s important to collect at scale? To whom? What do they need it for?

Again - great, ambitious idea! But $250k goes fast. Show value before it runs out!

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton