Comment

Comment by crackercrews

This creates three problems. The first is that some white people who were affected will believe it was because of their race. The second is that minorities who were not affected may be assumed to have been kept because of their minority status.

But the most harmful is for minorities who were laid off. That signals that they were really subpar, even more than the average laid off person.

It seems like this policy has two negative impacts on minorities and only one on white people. Some would say that's a disparate effect on minorities, and the policy is therefore racist. /s

edit: these are just the perception problems. There's also the fact that it is possibly illegal and unethical.

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton