The whole blog is like this; it's all sort of comically smug "everybody else in the entire world is wrong, and here is a 7-point axiomatic derivation proving it"†, much of it depending on specific definitions of specific words. Check-mate, atheists!
There are lots of good, sharp, critical things to say about the DEI movement, most especially "institutional" DEI, but you can't meaningfully say them when you write with this tone, can you? Who's going to take you seriously? Like, at a bare minimum, you have to acknowledge (or take the trouble to refute) the concerns that animate your opposition.
The author isn't a rando! This is a tenured professor of philosophy at a major university. You know, writing like a high school sophomore on a message board.
† I highly recommend his carefully reasoned, inescapable argument that everyone has the right to own a gun for a perfect example of the form.
There are lots of good, sharp, critical things to say about the DEI movement, most especially "institutional" DEI, but you can't meaningfully say them when you write with this tone, can you? Who's going to take you seriously? Like, at a bare minimum, you have to acknowledge (or take the trouble to refute) the concerns that animate your opposition.
The author isn't a rando! This is a tenured professor of philosophy at a major university. You know, writing like a high school sophomore on a message board.
† I highly recommend his carefully reasoned, inescapable argument that everyone has the right to own a gun for a perfect example of the form.