Is the CEO non-technical, older, more focused on wining/dining/if-we-just-land-that-one-logo/we'll-land-investors/social-proof-board-name-dropping/networking-is-the-game/exagerating-sometimes-lying and do you have disproportionately less equity, were you bearish on getting to 30 people in the first place before being a solid, viable, business? Do you find yourself thinking that the company could run with fewer than ten very specific people?
Does work get done more effectively when the CEO does not interfere/mess things up but you don't allow yourself to say so?
Does it happen you watch clips from The Office's Michael Scott and it hits too close to home?
PS: Also, are you sure you're a co-founder and are you certain you actually do have equity? Did a lawyer you (not the company/CEO) have paid go over this? Are you in the bylaws?
Does work get done more effectively when the CEO does not interfere/mess things up but you don't allow yourself to say so?
Does it happen you watch clips from The Office's Michael Scott and it hits too close to home?
PS: Also, are you sure you're a co-founder and are you certain you actually do have equity? Did a lawyer you (not the company/CEO) have paid go over this? Are you in the bylaws?