If by chance, a real "climate change denier" existed, and I know they don't, it's only people who are concerned about government overreach and totalitarian measures enacted by innumerate hippies that will do more harm than good.
But, if one did exist, where would you differ from them on actual policy?
You don't want people to do studies. You don't want governments to fund stuff. You don't want governments to restrict energy (by which you mean fossil fuels, not cheap renewables). You appear to be suggesting that even the believers don't actually believe.
I mean, there's a whole range of opinions on climate change from eco-communists to eco-capitalists to eco-futurists to eco-fascists, even fossil fuel companies have published net-zero plans, but your take seems to be just "don't do stuff".
Can you expand on that a bit more, because that response feels very like climate change denial to me, which you say you're not, and indeed no one is, doing.
But, if one did exist, where would you differ from them on actual policy?
You don't want people to do studies. You don't want governments to fund stuff. You don't want governments to restrict energy (by which you mean fossil fuels, not cheap renewables). You appear to be suggesting that even the believers don't actually believe.
I mean, there's a whole range of opinions on climate change from eco-communists to eco-capitalists to eco-futurists to eco-fascists, even fossil fuel companies have published net-zero plans, but your take seems to be just "don't do stuff".
Can you expand on that a bit more, because that response feels very like climate change denial to me, which you say you're not, and indeed no one is, doing.