> will be "among the lowest priorities" for law enforcement.
By that standard, both San Francisco and Los Angeles have decriminalized all drugs, alongside open containers, prostitution on the street, prostitution in strip clubs, prostitution elsewhere indoors, and practically every other vice.
And I'm reaaallly not saying this from a position of envy or disdain, only accuracy, there is also a completely parallel society for people living in tents where enforcement of anything is a stated non-priority.
Seeing an article about a board actually voting on a measure to "lower law enforcement priority" is kind of redundant! The Mayors and DA's have already dug their heels in, what does anything like this actually change? Does it force county/city judges to auto-drop cases if an officer and prosecutor fail to do so themselves?
Seems redundant if it can't actually do anything differently.
By that standard, both San Francisco and Los Angeles have decriminalized all drugs, alongside open containers, prostitution on the street, prostitution in strip clubs, prostitution elsewhere indoors, and practically every other vice.
And I'm reaaallly not saying this from a position of envy or disdain, only accuracy, there is also a completely parallel society for people living in tents where enforcement of anything is a stated non-priority.
Seeing an article about a board actually voting on a measure to "lower law enforcement priority" is kind of redundant! The Mayors and DA's have already dug their heels in, what does anything like this actually change? Does it force county/city judges to auto-drop cases if an officer and prosecutor fail to do so themselves?
Seems redundant if it can't actually do anything differently.