After reading some more of the transcript, I think the article does such a bad job of describing what was being asked for that it makes the court seem incompetent and Facebook actually rather reasonable. My original comment is below:
Government contracted construction workers: We Have No Idea Where Your Tax Money Goes
When tasked with answering the simple question "Which specific bricks did my tax money buy this year", the two veteran construction workers looked confused and tried to explain that that's not really how taxes work.
The special master at times seemed in disbelief, as when he questioned the engineers over whether any invoices existed for a particular road building contract. “Someone must have a receipt that says this is who the money came from that bought these bricks”
I'm not sure the analogy fits 100%, but it's the closest I could think of. This reads like the author thinks the Facebook algorithm is a human-readable decision tree that only takes into account the data of a single user at a time.
As usual, the problem is not data "collection" or "retention" or "privacy", but "creation". Regulation will always remain woefully inadequate to control such organizations, and the only solution is to adopt systems that don't spew user data everywhere in the first place.
Government contracted construction workers: We Have No Idea Where Your Tax Money Goes
When tasked with answering the simple question "Which specific bricks did my tax money buy this year", the two veteran construction workers looked confused and tried to explain that that's not really how taxes work.
The special master at times seemed in disbelief, as when he questioned the engineers over whether any invoices existed for a particular road building contract. “Someone must have a receipt that says this is who the money came from that bought these bricks”
I'm not sure the analogy fits 100%, but it's the closest I could think of. This reads like the author thinks the Facebook algorithm is a human-readable decision tree that only takes into account the data of a single user at a time.
As usual, the problem is not data "collection" or "retention" or "privacy", but "creation". Regulation will always remain woefully inadequate to control such organizations, and the only solution is to adopt systems that don't spew user data everywhere in the first place.