> I find this section peculiar. Why does the company have "values"? I though companies were supposed to be looking after the intrests of their shareholders, i.e., profit. Do the shareholders consent to the lost profit being donated to political motives? This broader trend of companies becoming political organizations is terrible, frankly.
This ship has sailed since about 2008: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social,_and_cor...
I would like to see new companies that completely reject the status quo in every way:
- No HR departments
- No virtue signaling whatsoever
- Cubicles are back, no open offices
- Only hire based on competence
- Explicitly prohibit any kind of activism at work
- No politics at work
- No tolerance to anything but work. If you sexually harrass someone, instantly fired.
- No woke HR training (no one watches it, yet no one has the courage to say anything about it)
- No green washing pledges (these are not as effective as public thinks)
I'd sign up for a job there. People need to read 1970's annual reports. They were so amazing.
This ship has sailed since about 2008: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social,_and_cor...
I would like to see new companies that completely reject the status quo in every way:
- No HR departments
- No virtue signaling whatsoever
- Cubicles are back, no open offices
- Only hire based on competence
- Explicitly prohibit any kind of activism at work
- No politics at work
- No tolerance to anything but work. If you sexually harrass someone, instantly fired.
- No woke HR training (no one watches it, yet no one has the courage to say anything about it)
- No green washing pledges (these are not as effective as public thinks)
I'd sign up for a job there. People need to read 1970's annual reports. They were so amazing.