You seem to be complaining about a lack of objective measurement from the author in terms of what is a "good" or "bad" design.
This confuses me because the point of the article was to talk about differences of 5 different kinds of design discipline. It's more of a dictionary of terms. And it's a helpful one.
This confuses me because the point of the article was to talk about differences of 5 different kinds of design discipline. It's more of a dictionary of terms. And it's a helpful one.