> People keep asking about examples of work that exemplifies "potential harms [that] outweigh the benefit of publication." How about large scale human vivisection?
People are asking for example of something this particular set of rules would prevent.
An example that's already illegal in the most extreme sense of the word doesn't convince anyone.
This is a straw man. The only people who won't see it as such are those who already agree with you.
People are asking for example of something this particular set of rules would prevent.
An example that's already illegal in the most extreme sense of the word doesn't convince anyone.
This is a straw man. The only people who won't see it as such are those who already agree with you.