I guess another way to put it: how much value does this test provide? Maybe an extreme opinion but I am totally okay with removing tests of little value. Tests require maintenance and attention, so is the test itself a net negative on the codebase? Just because you have a test for a component, it doesn't necessarily mean that the test is valuable. Testing for the sake of testing isn't a great idea.
That being said, I understand what the test is doing also thanks to your explanation! My point is if you refactor the internal behaviour, the implementation details, then a good test would not need to be changed either. As in I want to keep the same look and design of the component, now with say different styles or maybe I dropped in a component from our UI library.. now there are no classnames but visually it's the same. So if I change the internal behaviour, the end result should be the same and the test shouldn't need to change.
That being said, I understand what the test is doing also thanks to your explanation! My point is if you refactor the internal behaviour, the implementation details, then a good test would not need to be changed either. As in I want to keep the same look and design of the component, now with say different styles or maybe I dropped in a component from our UI library.. now there are no classnames but visually it's the same. So if I change the internal behaviour, the end result should be the same and the test shouldn't need to change.