> That doesn't justify the search and seizure of all his customers' property without due process.
The fundamental due process issue doesn't seem to be in dispute, though remedies for that are being litigated.
What the article is focussed on is not the due process issues, but the right of people outside of those directly affected and whose rights related to involved property are being litigated to law enforcement background information relating to the planning for the operations, which is a completely separate issue.
The fundamental due process issue doesn't seem to be in dispute, though remedies for that are being litigated.
What the article is focussed on is not the due process issues, but the right of people outside of those directly affected and whose rights related to involved property are being litigated to law enforcement background information relating to the planning for the operations, which is a completely separate issue.