There is so much of this, through many fields of science today. Incentives that corrupt and undermine the scientific method. And yet, many people will deny that there is justification in skepticism of say, relatively new mRNA vaccines.
Yes, it's good that science usually deals with such problems in the long run, but how is the average person supposed to trust that the latest scientific assurance, isn't 15 years away from being retracted like in this example?
Yes, it's good that science usually deals with such problems in the long run, but how is the average person supposed to trust that the latest scientific assurance, isn't 15 years away from being retracted like in this example?