> Code coverage has absolutely nothing to do with code quality
This absolute is somewhat misplaced in my experience. Yes hitting 100% code coverage does not inherently make the code better, but it does force people to look up the tests that were there before and it often helps with providing some form of context.
"Code coverage is only loosely correlated with code quality" would be my take.
This absolute is somewhat misplaced in my experience. Yes hitting 100% code coverage does not inherently make the code better, but it does force people to look up the tests that were there before and it often helps with providing some form of context.
"Code coverage is only loosely correlated with code quality" would be my take.