In both cases I think the problem is that you and the author are slinging around judgements without any actual references to specific code. It's easy to make broad statements.
In your case, you tend to imply that these are due to Rust itself. But is it just due to manpower? C APIs have had so many man hours behind them I can't imagine Rust even being within orders of magnitude.
Without diving into the details these broad statements are just pointless.
In your case, you tend to imply that these are due to Rust itself. But is it just due to manpower? C APIs have had so many man hours behind them I can't imagine Rust even being within orders of magnitude.
Without diving into the details these broad statements are just pointless.