Lousy article. For example, the author complains about a supposed 'lesson learned' that says (shortened) "If so-and-so happens it may be because of A, or it may be because of B". His complaint is "except that it may be because of C or D".
But the 'lesson' he presented never claimed to be an exclusive either-or.
It just says "here are two possible explanations for something".
There's sloppy thinking like this throughout. Thumbs down for me.
But the 'lesson' he presented never claimed to be an exclusive either-or. It just says "here are two possible explanations for something".
There's sloppy thinking like this throughout. Thumbs down for me.