Comment by woah

It's funny to see the Economist try to view crypto through a traditional finance lens. The companies rescued by SBF are idiotic, promising to provide stable returns using extremely risky investment strategies. They are the bottom feeders of crypto, as well as being one of the most boring things about it. The Economist seems to want to make crypto reporting part of their purview- why don't they look at some of the interesting developments such as AMMs, algorithmic stablecoins, DAOs, etc?