Every surpreme court article makes me hate this community a bit more.
There is far too much obsessing over "their logic is consistent" and far too much intentional ignorance of the fact that they chose which logic to bring to bear on which issues, and that there are many other possible ways to apply consistent logic.
Their logic can be consistent and they can still be partisans, looking to implement a specific agenda.
I don't believe people on this site are too stupid to realize that, I believe they prefer not to, because they support the outcomes these rulings enact.
There is far too much obsessing over "their logic is consistent" and far too much intentional ignorance of the fact that they chose which logic to bring to bear on which issues, and that there are many other possible ways to apply consistent logic.
Their logic can be consistent and they can still be partisans, looking to implement a specific agenda.
I don't believe people on this site are too stupid to realize that, I believe they prefer not to, because they support the outcomes these rulings enact.
And given that, we are in a lot of trouble.