So what. None of those technical differences are relevant to restricting a fundamental right. The authors of the First Amendment didn't anticipate the Internet, but we don't use that as an arbitrary reason to restrict free speech. And you have completely misunderstood the meaning of "well regulated". Read the actual Supreme Court decisions.
Just because one person violated the Constitution doesn't give you the right to do the same. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Just because one person violated the Constitution doesn't give you the right to do the same. Two wrongs don't make a right.