I have a parallel term I use, jiggle programmers. They can jiggle code around until it works, often working off existing code. They may become obsessed with refactoring because it's the only kind of programming they really understand.
They usually cannot write code from scratch, or when they do it contains a huge amount of plumbing copied from other familiar codebases without any reason for its purpose. It's kind of like they can read a foreign language, but they cannot speak it. Or maybe a parrot who can produce the sounds without the meaning.
I do think Google has caused some of this. But the other secret, I think it's how most people program by default. Animals largely learn by copying. The deconstruction of concepts to primitives, and synthesis of these primitives into new ideas if a very academic way to approach things. Centuries have proven this approach is superior, but it takes a huge amount of effort, and many things are lost in this process. (Ever do a physics problem with spherical cows?) With the rise of self-taught programmers, you will see more take this copying approach than the academic redistillation.
They usually cannot write code from scratch, or when they do it contains a huge amount of plumbing copied from other familiar codebases without any reason for its purpose. It's kind of like they can read a foreign language, but they cannot speak it. Or maybe a parrot who can produce the sounds without the meaning.
I do think Google has caused some of this. But the other secret, I think it's how most people program by default. Animals largely learn by copying. The deconstruction of concepts to primitives, and synthesis of these primitives into new ideas if a very academic way to approach things. Centuries have proven this approach is superior, but it takes a huge amount of effort, and many things are lost in this process. (Ever do a physics problem with spherical cows?) With the rise of self-taught programmers, you will see more take this copying approach than the academic redistillation.