Why does the article repeat this known-to-be-false assertion about Wikileaks?
"But WikiLeaks had also shown, quite recently, a willingness to be a mouthpiece for foreign intelligence services: in 2016, the site had released e-mails from the Democratic National Committee which had been stolen by hackers working on behalf of the Kremlin."
The DNC leak was an inside job and not a result of a "hack".
"But WikiLeaks had also shown, quite recently, a willingness to be a mouthpiece for foreign intelligence services: in 2016, the site had released e-mails from the Democratic National Committee which had been stolen by hackers working on behalf of the Kremlin."
The DNC leak was an inside job and not a result of a "hack".
https://nypost.com/2017/08/15/new-report-claims-dnc-hack-was...