Wow, such good ideas here. I guess no one is keen on my "RAPR" proposal :)
But just to reflect a bit more, I think my curiosity/confusion stems from the "is initialization" wording, and how the word "initialization" in the context of C++ will imply a guaranteed freeing step?
I've tried reconciling how its defined here:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/initialization
However, it seems like wording describing ideas around how a resource is created, and not how it's completed.