> By comparison, the standard library reaches 58/128/117 MB/s on the same CPU, so we have managed a 9-19x speedup depending on the type of numbers.
That's pretty disingenuous. The standard implementation is known to be terribly slow because of constraints. They should compare against current state of the art.
That's pretty disingenuous. The standard implementation is known to be terribly slow because of constraints. They should compare against current state of the art.