The article doesn't even speak to the obvious rebuttals: 1) the "touch screen" Android interface is mostly driven by buttons, 2) the iPhone was launched 11 months earlier, 3) the blackberry looking phone is the one the guy was carrying around for 6 mo.
Right or wrong, an argument that does not address obvious rebuttals is not an argument, it's wishful thinking in an echo chamber.
Right or wrong, an argument that does not address obvious rebuttals is not an argument, it's wishful thinking in an echo chamber.