I think it's a matter of perspective. Creativity as an ability to create something new will always be relevant. At the core concept, creative ideas are just ideas, and something needs to translate them into the real world. Right now we are learning skills to do this. In the future, AI could do it for us.
In that case, there is an information bottleneck. If you, as a single entity, have an idea and skills needed to translate it, then internal communication in your brain is very fast. But when we as a creator have an idea and describe it to AI (or even other humans), there is some very lossy compression going on.
Creative jobs in 10 years will probably shift to focus more on being able to communicate those ideas well to "execution units" and back, so the skill to learn would be mapping some internal "mindset" of an AI to predict outcomes.
In that case, there is an information bottleneck. If you, as a single entity, have an idea and skills needed to translate it, then internal communication in your brain is very fast. But when we as a creator have an idea and describe it to AI (or even other humans), there is some very lossy compression going on.
Creative jobs in 10 years will probably shift to focus more on being able to communicate those ideas well to "execution units" and back, so the skill to learn would be mapping some internal "mindset" of an AI to predict outcomes.