Comment

Comment by sdoering

The links in the article point to various things the author uncovered over time.

You could habe taken one example and shown that the author is overstating or misrepresenting the facts.

Instead you choose to call them a "smear merchant".

Aren't we on HN to discuss based on presented (and maybe omitted) facts? Or is it to hand out unsubstantiated ad hominems?

parent sdoering 4 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton