Privacy is not binary. There are degrees of it and it's dependent on context.
The problem here is that DDG promotes itself as a highly private service and at the same time makes a deal to share tracking data with (arguably) one of the worst privacy offenders.
This makes them substantially less privacy-friendly than they make it seem.
The problem here is that DDG promotes itself as a highly private service and at the same time makes a deal to share tracking data with (arguably) one of the worst privacy offenders.
This makes them substantially less privacy-friendly than they make it seem.