So a psychologist who wrote a book condemning the original twins IQ study now publishes a paper where she purportedly refutes that study's most famous findings based on the analysis of a single set of separated twins?
Isn't this the ultimate in p-hacking? Is there any reason to draw any conclusions from a sample size of one?
Isn't this the ultimate in p-hacking? Is there any reason to draw any conclusions from a sample size of one?