Not specifically picking on you (thanks for replying) but may I
rephrase that a little and then ask something;
"Sinners look just like saints, so it's necessary to punish all, to
destroy the riches of the many in order that wicked few do not
escape."
Is that a fair framing of the "ethics" of what you said? (I'm not
attributing that as 'your' argument, I understand you're kinda just
trying to 'explain' something as you see it).
Do you think this kind of thinking can continue to stand if technology
is ever going to be fair and useful to everyone? Or do we just accept
that technology always amplifies as least as many problems and
injustices as it solves?
Do you think this kind of thinking can continue to stand if technology is ever going to be fair and useful to everyone? Or do we just accept that technology always amplifies as least as many problems and injustices as it solves?