> "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic..."
The decision for the first quote you used was overturned afterward, over 50 years ago now. It's misrepresentative of the current state of the law and you shouldn't use it as an example.
The decision for the first quote you used was overturned afterward, over 50 years ago now. It's misrepresentative of the current state of the law and you shouldn't use it as an example.
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-tim...