Comment by flyingcircus3

Banned twitter users are all free to type out what they would have tweeted, while twitter exercises its right not to listen to, and subsequently distribute it. A more apt analogy is that the person is using someone else's public address system to speak to a lot of people efficiently. Third parties may just keep their head down and ignore it, but the owner of the public address system can and should have standards of what their willing to amplify. The owner is also not restricting the speech of a person he refuses to amplify.