Nothing you wrote is about errors in itself, you exclusively talk about the social interpretations/construction of it. These are things that every adult needs to be able to improvise and express on-the-fly, nothing 'static' that could be fruitfully discussed independently of specific occurrences.
Late edit: So, when interpreted in my context, its utter crap! Your article is shit! You explicitly invited your readers to disregard cross-checking against your own intentions[1], saying they "don't matter". Its basically a free card for me to project my prejudices onto you, without you having anything to conter it. You are a fragile individual who does not think things through.
Late edit: So, when interpreted in my context, its utter crap! Your article is shit! You explicitly invited your readers to disregard cross-checking against your own intentions[1], saying they "don't matter". Its basically a free card for me to project my prejudices onto you, without you having anything to conter it. You are a fragile individual who does not think things through.
[1] https://ferd.ca/inclusiveness-in-language-for-outsiders-look..., Section "Death of the Author"