This story makes me see a pattern in this author's writing: While looking at the world, they see that something is off, that something is not as one would to be expected, accurately points it out the dissonance, and then draws really weird conclusions that do not seem conclusive to me.
Yes, errors are not objective, but they aren't constructed, either. Our expectations are constructed (docs and standards likewise), and the mismatch to it (the error) is something objective that can be discovered.
Yes, errors are not objective, but they aren't constructed, either. Our expectations are constructed (docs and standards likewise), and the mismatch to it (the error) is something objective that can be discovered.
Really odd framing...