Many of the examples make this article hard to take seriously. For example:
> Your landlord is telling you what colors can be used for paint inside your apartment (if you live in a rent-controlled apartment): You should be able to do what you want with your property.
If you have a landlord, it is by definition NOT your property. Also, what difference does it make if its rent-controlled or not?
> Being required to get an ID card when getting on an airplane: People shouldn’t treat innocent individuals like criminals simply because they want peace of mind.
"Being required to get an ID" does not equal "being treated like a criminal."
I also would have expected to see some mention of civil asset forfeiture.
> Your landlord is telling you what colors can be used for paint inside your apartment (if you live in a rent-controlled apartment): You should be able to do what you want with your property.
If you have a landlord, it is by definition NOT your property. Also, what difference does it make if its rent-controlled or not?
> Being required to get an ID card when getting on an airplane: People shouldn’t treat innocent individuals like criminals simply because they want peace of mind.
"Being required to get an ID" does not equal "being treated like a criminal."
I also would have expected to see some mention of civil asset forfeiture.