I've been living and breathing this project for over two years. From an "is the project healthy" perspective, your explanation of what you interpret from these analytics makes no sense to me. I suspect there's some pre-existing bias as well. (I.E. yes, Next is a
very popular front-end React framework and it's been around for a few more years.)
Note: I love analytics. I just think this is, well, weird reasoning from the face of it.
I'll counter with this — here are the metrics I focus on as a measure of "is our open source project healthy"?
- How many unique contributors are there per release? && Is the number growing, steady, or decreasing?
- How many new contributors are there on a monthly basis && Is the number growing, steady, or decreasing?
tl;dr:
Redwood is healthy
Note: I love analytics. I just think this is, well, weird reasoning from the face of it.
I'll counter with this — here are the metrics I focus on as a measure of "is our open source project healthy"?
- How many unique contributors are there per release? && Is the number growing, steady, or decreasing?
- How many new contributors are there on a monthly basis && Is the number growing, steady, or decreasing?
tl;dr:
Redwood is healthy