I think it's not a bad article, especially for someone new to blogging. You don't claim to have all the answers, and that's okay. The article was a good length, and well presented, without any unnecessary JavaScript or adverts.
> On the other hand there is more permanency than previously on Web 2.0.
Is that necessarily the case with Web 3.0? Certainly any data stored on-chain is likely to be more permanent, in practice, than in current architectures, but the on-chain data might just be a hash, or possibly even a zero knowledge proof.
> These systems enable anyone to host a node in the network and participate the in decentralization.
> On the other hand there is more permanency than previously on Web 2.0.
Is that necessarily the case with Web 3.0? Certainly any data stored on-chain is likely to be more permanent, in practice, than in current architectures, but the on-chain data might just be a hash, or possibly even a zero knowledge proof.
> These systems enable anyone to host a node in the network and participate the in decentralization.
You might want to fix that typo.