This is poorly written; words and punctuation are missing all over the place.
I don’t understand the git analogy at all.
> If we’re extending the definition of web3 to include decentralized software systems
We certainly aren’t. Web3 is defined by “trustless” decentralized systems (which usually aren’t actually decentralized, in practice).
Branding a database as “Web3” is terrible PR, given web3’s reputation for obscene inefficiency and high latency. The marketing team should reconsider this post.
I don’t understand the git analogy at all.
> If we’re extending the definition of web3 to include decentralized software systems
We certainly aren’t. Web3 is defined by “trustless” decentralized systems (which usually aren’t actually decentralized, in practice).
Branding a database as “Web3” is terrible PR, given web3’s reputation for obscene inefficiency and high latency. The marketing team should reconsider this post.