Comment

Comment by bee_rider

They go into a bit more detail about possible explanations here (this is cited in the paper that the article talks about).

https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14805

They talk about your option in 5.11, "Einstein rings." For reasons that I don't understand (but I don't understand anything about optics) they come to the conclusion that the gravitational lens would have to be really large, and it is unlikely that such a large, well-structured lens would exist.

parent bee_rider 4 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton