Comment Comment by Hendrikto > SystemD is complicated for a laypersonIs it? It has clean and logical abstractions, and consistency. Services depending in each other isn‘t complex or difficult to understand.I suspect that a nice GUI would make systemd quite usable for non-expert users.BTW: It‘s called ”systemd“:> Yes, it is written systemd, not system D or System D, or even SystemD. And it isn't system d either. [0][0]: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/#spelling parent Hendrikto 4 years ago
Is it? It has clean and logical abstractions, and consistency. Services depending in each other isn‘t complex or difficult to understand.
I suspect that a nice GUI would make systemd quite usable for non-expert users.
BTW: It‘s called ”systemd“:
> Yes, it is written systemd, not system D or System D, or even SystemD. And it isn't system d either. [0]
[0]: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/#spelling