Appreciate the feedback! We've had people use organizations in both ways, honestly. The implementation is definitely more like a Gmail group of users than a company.
In your example, some people have implemented it as Acme is the organization, and some people have implemented it as specific teams within Acme are an organization.
I suspect we'll need to add a second tier (e.g. a team or a group) underneath a more rigid definition of a company. Would that have made things more clear?
In your example, some people have implemented it as Acme is the organization, and some people have implemented it as specific teams within Acme are an organization.
I suspect we'll need to add a second tier (e.g. a team or a group) underneath a more rigid definition of a company. Would that have made things more clear?