>If it's backwards incompatible, it's basically a new library under the same name and development team.
This, this, and a hundred more times this.
Incompatible is incompatible.
There is no "kinda incompatible", "99% compatible" - when it comes to dependencies, they either work properly or they don't.
Software should be eternal. Without being strict about semantic versioning, it is impossible to make it so.
This, this, and a hundred more times this.
Incompatible is incompatible. There is no "kinda incompatible", "99% compatible" - when it comes to dependencies, they either work properly or they don't.
Software should be eternal. Without being strict about semantic versioning, it is impossible to make it so.