CC-BY 4.0 is a perfectly good open license for non-source-code. OSI lists licenses for code, which is why it doesn’t list CC 4.0 licenses.
Finally, go check out the license for the OSI website. It’s CC-BY 4.0, same as this.
It’s not even at the degree of sleight of hand as treating dy/dx as a fraction. It’s perfectly cromulent, not abusive of “open source” and perfectly in line with the principles.
I know the HN community is huge on being negative and stuff but come on, man. If you’re going to be all “abuses the term open source” and shit like that, at least bother to have some basic knowledge.
Finally, go check out the license for the OSI website. It’s CC-BY 4.0, same as this.
It’s not even at the degree of sleight of hand as treating dy/dx as a fraction. It’s perfectly cromulent, not abusive of “open source” and perfectly in line with the principles.
I know the HN community is huge on being negative and stuff but come on, man. If you’re going to be all “abuses the term open source” and shit like that, at least bother to have some basic knowledge.