> You don't think, there are limits to the things I should be allowed to say about you?
No.
The only concession I would consider is a call to violence if there is an real and immediate threat. Not internet death threats.
The second I may concede would be defamation under a very strict standard e.g. You were claiming someone broke a law.
> Or about the things I think other people should do to you?
People can say anything they like to me or about me. What they cannot do is vandalise my property, take my property or assault me.
> (are you aware, that there is a difference btw. between literally killing people and people dying of starvation because of incompetence? Apparently not.)
If you are talking about the Communists. The communists killed and imprisoned a huge number of people. Also some of the famines were entirely predictable and in some cases were deliberate.
No.
The only concession I would consider is a call to violence if there is an real and immediate threat. Not internet death threats.
The second I may concede would be defamation under a very strict standard e.g. You were claiming someone broke a law.
> Or about the things I think other people should do to you?
People can say anything they like to me or about me. What they cannot do is vandalise my property, take my property or assault me.
> (are you aware, that there is a difference btw. between literally killing people and people dying of starvation because of incompetence? Apparently not.)
If you are talking about the Communists. The communists killed and imprisoned a huge number of people. Also some of the famines were entirely predictable and in some cases were deliberate.